Killer Women S01E06 HDTV x264-LOL

this show suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuux so much!

this is ep. 7. (daughter of the alamo). where is the real episode 6 (demons)?

incorrect.

1x06 -- feb 18, 2014 -- daughter of the alamo

read...

show information page:
http://eztv.it/shows/948/killer-women/
show description, air dates, show resources, and torrent links.

there's an episode missing. this is episode 7 - daughter of the alamo.
imdb's site says that episode 6 is called demons and should have aired back to back with episode 5
on feb 11th.

imdb is great for movie info, cast lists, reviews, ratings, etc..
but of all the sources to use for tv episodes listings they
are one of the worst...they are very often wrong!

after episode two, the episode order changed.

read the show information page.
http://eztv.it/shows/948/killer-women/
use more than one source for info.
i proivided 9 links to sources of
information specifically for this show.
you're sitting in front of a computer
connected to the internet...use it.
i put a great deal of time into
researching before updating pages.
i expect you to do the same before
commenting that our page info is
the one that is wrong. i'm not
always correct, and i welcome
corrections, but please do your
research!


p.s. i submitted correct data to imdb's data correction team.

in summary, everybody is right, except imdb, looks like: there were no two episodes aired last week.

the first five episodes to be aired were the first five to be produced, but this one was the seventh to be
produced, thus the skip in continuity. whether to call this one episode 6 or 7 depends on how one counts,
which is always arbitrary to some extent - except for cases in which episode numbers are actually shown
on-screen, i s'pose, but i can't recall ever seeing that.

the missing episode, and the eighth (the original finale) have apparently been produced and may or may
not be aired at some later date and/or eventually released in another format. i guess a belated dirfix for
this one is a possibility, if that does happen, though again i can't actually recall ever seeing such a thing.

well hello there kassyopeia, long time no see.
i always enjoy and appreciate your comments.

there will be no dirfix. there is no error in episode numbering.
episodes are numbered in the order that they air....not by their
production number, or the originally intended episode order.

if a network creates 20 episodes, then later decides to shorten the season 10, and they
cut out, do not air, the even numbered episodes, the episode numbers would be 1 through 10, not
1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19. this is also the case for when they change the order that they will air in;
if 5 episodes are produced and originally intended to air in the order they were produced and
numbered, and they change the order before airing, the episodes number will still be 1 through 5,
as they air, not something like 1,3,4,2,5. ...that would be crazy and even more confusing.

long time indeed. 🙂

if i were a scene releaser, i'm thinking i might decide to do a retroactive dirfix on the hdtv releases
in a case like this *if* the full (and continuity-ordered) season is later released on disk, to re-align the
numbering with that of the diskrips, considering that most groups identify episodes by number only. but
i'm not a scene releaser, and as i said i don't recall any precedents, so take that for what little it's
worth.

imdb assigns episode numbers strictly by airdate (well, supposedly, anyway), but my impression is that
most other resources (including whichever ones the release groups base their filenames on) are more
flexible in cases in which that clashes with continuity, or the intentions of the creators, or whatever. for
example, broadcasters have been known to accidentally air the wrong episode one week and then re-
schedule subsequent episodes in whichever way seems best to remedy that blunder, and they've been
known to drop specific episodes on short notice due to current events or legal issues or suchlike. from
what i've seen, imdb is pretty much alone in insisting on strictly continuous numbering in those
situations, just as they are pretty much alone in insisting on having house rules for other aspects of
numbering (such as whether to call irregular openers "0" or "1", and whether to assign double-length
episodes one or two episode numbers, et cetera) without regard to what official or semi-official sources
have to say on those matters.

the case at hand doesn't call for an exception quite as loudly as those, but the obviousness of the
continuity-skip could certainly be used to justify one. as you implied above, the overriding consideration
should be to avoid confusion - which isn't necessarily the same thing as slavishly following air dates.

hm, i'm remembering a few real-life cases now in which similar issues were touched on:

- weren't one or two episodes of "24" skipped during the original airings? anyway, it's sufficient that that
could have happened. that format gets about as close to "on-screen episode numbers" as can be,
short of a literal case, which relegates airdates to secondary significance in that regard.

- that mess with the three-part "archer" special between seasons. which was never fully resolved, so...
not helpful.

- "fringe" had that odd episode which was produced as part of season one but aired during season two,
making it seem like a deceased main character had inexplicably been brought back to life. there was quite
a bit of divergence in episode number assignments subsequent to that for a while... but i don't recall that
touching on scene releases.

didn't mean to insult anyone and i deeply appreciate the hard work done here, it's just that the
first few minutes of the show starts with "previously on..." and most of the scenes i did not see in
episode 5. it was as if i had missed an episode and on a few sites that i had checked (including
imbd) mentioned an episode 6 name "demons". my two cents...

e7 & e8 is up on the pirate shi..!