Lost S03E03 HR HDTV AC3 5 1 XviD-NBS - Forums - EZTV

Posted at 19/10/2006, 01:45

i'm new - what is the actual difference between this one and the lost s03e03
hdtv xvid-lol torrent, besides the size?

Posted at 19/10/2006, 01:51

this one is in high res, noted by the hr

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
hr comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768

Posted at 19/10/2006, 02:03

#1720

✎ Quote by keloran

this one is in high res, noted by the hr

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
hr comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768

pwwfh - standard is good enough for me. 690+ mb is a lot more.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 02:07

#1724

✎ Quote by dr. doom

pwwfh - standard is good enough for me. 690+ mb is a lot more.

well worth it if you have hdtv.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 02:56

#1738

✎ Quote by dr. doom

✎ Quote by keloran

this one is in high res, noted by the hr

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
hr comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768

pwwfh - standard is good enough for me. 690+ mb is a lot more.

sure, if you enjoy watching sdtv but the quality of the extra 350meg is worth it
for the detail. depends what connection you're on i suppose.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 02:59

#1741

yeah, hr is something around 1024x768, definitely. these hr episodes are good
for collecting, better than dvd!

Posted at 19/10/2006, 03:08

#1745

✎ Quote by jc

yeah, hr is something around 1024x768, definitely. these hr episodes
are good
for collecting, better than dvd!

but with the abc watermark.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 03:25

#1750

i agree with the others: the hr version looks noticably better on a 32" lcd and
shows a tremendous improvement on larger screens. and if you are going to
archive them to dvd, why archive the inferior quality?

Posted at 19/10/2006, 03:49

#1752

✎ Quote by colossos

i agree with the others: the hr version looks noticably better
on a 32" lcd and
shows a tremendous improvement on larger screens. and if you are going to
archive them to dvd, why archive the inferior quality?

well i'd rather wait for the dvd.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 04:02

#1755

yep standard does me fine... i delete them after i watch them anyway, so if i
did want to keep them for the sake of keeping them, id go out and buy the dvd
when theyre released.

even back in the olden days of vhs, id reuse the tape, wouldnt keep a shelf full
of tapes just for the sake of it.

either way, kudos to all who up and who seed !!! 8]

Posted at 19/10/2006, 04:04

#1756

what is the resolution on a dvd anyway, because on my 20.1 widescreen all xvid
& divx rips look pretty nasty at the monitor's native res of 1680 x 1050.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 04:12

#1757

✎ Quote by niki

what is the resolution on a dvd anyway, because on my 20.1
widescreen all xvid
& divx rips look pretty nasty at the monitor's native res of 1680 x 1050.

xvid is divx backwards. 🙂

Posted at 19/10/2006, 05:32

#1771

the most obvious thing for me is it is 5.1 ac3 instead of stereo.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 05:51

#1775

✎ Quote by keloran

standard comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 640x480
hr comes in (at least i shows on my screen like it) 1024x768

huh? standard (350 mb) is 624*352 px and this hr hd release is 960*544 px.

Posted at 19/10/2006, 06:40

#1781

✎ Quote by mtmra70

the most obvious thing for me is it is 5.1 ac3 instead of
stereo.

is it a proper 5.1 sountrack? i have never tried to figure it out because i
get a dummy 5.1 track from the smaller encodes because its stereo surround but
if it is proper 5.1, its worth the extra megs.