those sarah connor numbers aren\'t looking so bad now, are they, unnamed fox
executive from a previous news item?
[#83875]
Written by: bbcgrrrl [12/03/2008, 20:10]
bwah hah hah hah!!!!!!
agreed! scc numbers look bloody marvelous in comparison!
side note: didn't much care for new amsterdam, but did like canterbury's law.
bbcgrrrl
[#83882]
Written by: mrperfecto [12/03/2008, 21:50]
lead in cantebury had 7 million viewers.new amsterdam rose to 9 million viewers.
not bad for new amsterdam. so a very misleading post. only cantebury did lowsy.
not amsterdam
[#84070]
Written by: macdruid [16/03/2008, 03:45]
seriously, new amsterdam pulled better overall numbers than 6 out of 9 episodes of scc so this was a
very misleading post.
| 1 of 1 |
